In a recent study, researchers compared nicotine absorption among children exposed to secondhand smoke with those who had no exposure.

The California Department of Public Health (CDPH), has been carrying out air sampling in vape shops throughout the state, as part of its initiative to determine the health effects of second-hand vapor exposure.

In what has certainly left many public health experts rolling their eyes, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has just announced a "Major Breakthrough", one that the former have been insisting on for the last few months: the infamous outbreak of EVALI, is almost certainly not linked with vaping legal nicotine products.

Tobacco harm reduction experts have long argued that restrictions of any one product, would lead to an increase in the sales of a counterpart. A recent study tested this hypothesis with regards to flavoured vaping products.

In recent years, countless headlines linking vaping to popcorn lung surfaced across the media. But what does scientific evidence tell us? Is there a really a connection between the two?

A long term study looking for possible lung damage after a cohort of non-smokers had used e-cigarettes daily for a number of years, indicated that these vapers suffered no lung damage, when their results were compared with those of non-vapers.